Captured or Killed...Why?
by Paul Wilson
Over four years have passed since that terrible day. Since 9/11/01, Americans have lived in fear and anger. Along with the tragic loss of life, the terrorists showed us how vulnerable we could be.
And it gave George W. Bush the opportunity he needed.
When Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attacks, our government went into action, promising swift justice. Bin Laden would be captured or killed.
I remember thinking, from the start, how odd this was. Captured or killed? What was this, the Old West?
Of course, America's thirst for revenge wanted the man who orchestrated these acts to pay...Perhaps, even with his life. But when did it become the military's function to simply assassinate a criminal suspect for alleged crimes he committed? That's right, I said alleged crimes. Because without a trial, the only proof we have that bin Laden is guilty is the word of our leaders.
When Timothy McVey committed his atrocity in Oklahoma City, people wanted him dead. But we tried him in a court of law and a jury of his peers convicted him and sentenced him to death. Even if you don't believe in the death penalty, you can still agree that McVey had his day in court.
Do we have the right to kill bin Laden outright? He is not the leader of a country, so no formal declaration of war can be made. This reduces him to a mere criminal...And a suspected criminal, at that. Despite Bush's disdain for the United Nations, this is exactly the kind of thing for which they were created.
But there is another question that bothers me far more: Why is Osama bin Laden still at large?
Supposedly, he has spent the last few years hiding in the caves of Afghanistan, cut off from technology that could pinpoint his location. And yet, bin Laden still manages to release video tapes to Arab television, proclaiming that his attacks on America will continue.
All the while, our military is mired in another country, fighting an illegal war, based on faulty (or fabricated) intelligence. And the loss of life in Iraq has well surpassed that of the World Trade Center (if you count Iraqi lives, of course).
Personally, I find it oddly coincidental that, with no word from bin Laden in over a year, his latest video should make its appearance just as President Bush is defending his use of the NSA to spy on his fellow Americans. In what is now a classic maneuver of using fear as misdirection, these threats always seem to appear whenever this administartion's strategies are criticized. I call it the "Orange Alert Gambit."
There are those who believe that Osama bin Laden may not have been behind 9-11; or that, if he was, he was put up to it. After all, at one time, he was our ally, trained and supplied with arms by our own military. The terrorists who hijacked the planes on that day were Arabs...Could it be that the "black sheep" of the bin Laden family is merely a scapegoat to protect our allies with oil?
Whether or not you believe these conspiracy theories, it behooves us to consider that Osama bin Laden best serves the Bush war machine by remaining alive and uncaptured. Dead, he is a martyr; Captured, he becomes just a man. But as a shadowy legend, hell-bent on destroying the American way of life, bin Laden represents the kind of intangible threat that feeds our fears and, therefore, blinds us to our country's slow destruction from within.
Will Osama bin laden ever be caught? It is clear that someone powerful is protecting him, in order to elude our military technology for so long. But, perhaps some day, bin Laden will outlive his usefulness. It could happen. Just ask Saddam Hussein.
Wherever he is, Osama bin Laden had better pray to Allah that Afghanistan never strikes oil...